1. India has emerged as an Information Technology Power House of the world, but not Indian Judiciary. Whether judicial accountability would include creation of paperless Court or atleast less paper Courts towards ensuring speedy justice is the issue indirectly arising for consideration in this case.

2. The first petitioner in both these Civil Revision Petitions / plaintiff instituted a suit in O.S.No.592 of 2004 seeking relief of partition against her brothers and sister.

2.1. Parimalam, (D-3 in O.S.No.592 of 2004), who is the plaintiff in O.S.No.153 /2005 also sought similar relief of partition (of 1/5th share) in the above suit.

2.2. Both suits were decreed.

3. Aggrieved over the same, defendants 1 and 2 filed two separate appeals in A.S.Nos.131 of 2009 and 44 of 2008. These appeals are said to be pending for a period of five/four years and directions are sought for speedy disposal of those appeals.

4. It is seen that in both the appeals, the records were called for and the same were awaited from III Additional Sub Court at Coimbatore, which is located in the same campus, where the District Court is also situated, from 04.02.2009 onwards.

5. Perusal of the docket en