SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Mad) 3400

S.TAMILVANAN
Arjun Neelakantan – Appellant
Versus
. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:T. Ramachandran, Advocate.

Judgment :

1. The Original Petition has been filed under Section 41(6) of Juvenile Justice (Care & Protection of Children) Act, 2000 (As amended by Act 33 of 2006) read with Clause 17 of the Letters Patent, seeking an order:

(a) that the petitioners be appointed as the adoptive parents of the person of the minors Muthumari, born on 03.05.2009 and Ashwini born on 19.03.2013;

(b) that the minors Muthumari and Ashwini be entitled to the legal status of a biological son and daughter with all the rights of succession and inheritance;

(c) that the petitioners be permitted to take physical custody of the minors Muthumari and Ashwini for being taken outside India, outside the jurisdiction of this Court for being adopted, brought up and maintained by them in their home town at P.O.Box.4473, Flat 2064, Building #2, La Rose De Sable, Crazy Signal, Doha, State of Qatar, UAE;

(d) that the minors may be accompanied by an escort to reach the petitioner's house at P.O.Box 4473, Flat 2064, Building #2, La Rose De Sable, Crazy Signal, Doha, State of Qatar, UAE.

2. The petitioners have stated that they are residing in the given address in Doha, State of Qatar, IAE and they are represented by power of

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top