2014 Supreme(Mad) 2171
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
N. KIRUBAKARAN, J.
Petitioner
Versus
Respondent
Crl.O.P(MD)No. 14573 of 2014 & M.P(MD)No. 1 of 2014
Decided On : 01-08-2014
The central legal point established in the judgment is the duty of lawyers to maintain high standards and ethics, and the responsibility of the Bar Council to prevent criminal elements from entering the legal profession.
Headnote:
Legal Profession - Criminal Background of Advocates - Advocates Act - Prevention of Criminal Elements from Entering Legal Profession - O.P. Sharma v. High Court of Punjab & Haryana (2011) 6 SCC 86, R.D. Saxona Vs. Balram Prasad Sharma (2000)7 SCC 264, Sudha v. President, Advocates Association, Chennai (2010) 14 SCC 114, V.C. Rangadurai v. D. Gopalan (1979) 1 SCC 308, Bar Council of Maharashtra v. M.V. Dabholkar (1975) 2 SCC 702 - The court discussed the importance of maintaining high standards and ethics in the legal profession, the duty of lawyers to serve the public, and the responsibility of the Bar Council to prevent criminal elements from entering the legal profession.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a practicing Advocate, sought to prevent individuals with criminal backgrounds from enrolling as Advocates, alleging that about 40% of the candidates proposed for enrollment had criminal backgrounds and obtained law degrees without attending classes.
Finding of the Court:
The court found the allegations shocking and emphasized the importance of maintaining the nobility of the legal profession and preventing criminal elements from entering the profession.
Issues: The issue was whether individuals with criminal backgrounds should be allowed to enroll as Advocates, and the veracity of the antecedent verification certificates provided by the candidates.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the legal profession is a noble calling and emphasized the duty of lawyers to maintain high standards and ethics. It also highlighted the responsibility of the Bar Council to prevent criminal elements from entering the legal profession.
Final Decision: The court directed the Bar Council to postpone the enrollment pending verification of the candidates' certificates, stating that public interest prevails over private interest.
N. Kirubakaran, J.
1. It is not a rosy picture, which the petitioner paints about the candidates, who are trying to sneak into legal profession by getting enrolled as Advocates. The petitioner who is a practising Advocate, has knocked the doors of this Court stating that those with criminal background with heinous crimes, purchased Law degrees from neighbouring States, like, Andhra and Karnataka without even attending classes and basic qualifications and are making attempt to enroll themselves before the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu in the enrolment to be held tomorrow ie., 02.08.2014.
2. The petitioner has stated in paragraph 3 to 5 as follows :
“3. It is submitted that the persons who cannot get admission in the law College in Tamil Nadu Government, they are getting admissions and buying LLB degrees in the Private college in Karnataka, Andhra, Chhattisgarth, Jharkhand and other northern States. At the time of enrolment, the applicant shall produce no objection certificate received from the police department that no criminal case is pending against him as on date. On receiving such application the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Pondicherry shall make cross verification regarding the genuine of certificates produced for getting enrolment.
4. It is submitted that while making such verification the police department shall verify that whether any criminal case is pending against him in any police station within Tamil Nadu. The applicant who involved in heinous offence shall not be permitted to enroll as Advocate in the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Pondicherry.
5. It is submitted that on 02.08.2014 the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Pondicherry proposed to enroll 900 members as Advocate. Further, 40% out of 900 persons are having criminal backgrounds and involved in heinous offences. The Bar Council of Tamil Nadu is proposed to enroll the persons who are involved in murder case, theft case and rape cases as advocates. Further so many persons purchased LLB degree in Karnataka, Andhra and other states for going to enroll in the Bar Council with criminal backgrounds.”
3. A perusal of the aforesaid paragraphs would shock everybody. It is alleged that out of 900 members, who are to be enrolled, about 40% of the persons are having criminal backgrounds involved in heinous offences and they managed to obtain police verification certificate suppressing their criminal backgrounds. The two persons, namely, Elango, from Ramnad District, who is said to be having 14 criminal pending cases and one Mr. Ali Siddick from Madurai is said to have 7 criminal cases to his credit are to be enrolled.
4. Mr. Peter Ramesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner would contend that already the profession has become the place for criminal elements, who got into the profession purchasing degree from LLBs and if the proposed enrolment is to be held, it would still more make it worse. Therefore, he seeks an order not to conduct the enrolment to be held on 02.08.2014.
5. Mr. P. Kandasamy, learned Government Advocate (crl.side) would submit that the petitioner has given a complaint with the higher police authorities and it would be looked into after due verification and appropriate steps would be taken, after due verification.
6. The nobility of the legal profession has been expressed in many judgments of the Honourable Supreme Court. The importance of the legal profession, high standards to be maintained and ethics to be followed by the Advocates are given in detail in various judgments, which are as follows:
(i) In O.P. Sharma v. High Court of Punjab & Haryana, (2011) 6 SCC 86. Paragraph 17 of the Judgement reads as follows :-
“17. The role and status of lawyers at the beginning of sovereign and democratic India is accounted as extremely vital in deciding that the nation’s administration was to be governed by the rule of law. They were considered intellectuals amongst the elites of the country and social activists amongst the downtrodden. These include the