S.RAJESWARAN, P.N.PRAKASH
S. Balakrishnan Pandiyan – Appellant
Versus
Superintendent of Police, Kanchipuram, Kanchipuram District – Respondent
P.N. Prakash, J.
1. Sitting in the Habeas Corpus jurisdiction, we frequently came across cases filed by young men between 21 and 25 contending that, the given detenue is his wife having married and registered the marriage either in the Office of the Marriage Registrar, Chennai North (Joint-I) or Marriage Registrar, Royapuram, and further alleging that the parents are keeping the detenue in illegal custody.
2. On the strength of the Marriage Certificate produced by the petitioner, we were routinely issuing Rule Nisi for the production of the detenue in order to check if she was in the illegal custody of her parents. In several cases we found the detenue, when produced before us, telling that she has not undergone any solemnisation of marriage with the petitioner and even repudiated the very Certificate of Marriage as a bogus one.
3. In HCP No.2767/2013, S. Balakrishnan Pandiyan, the petitioner, has stated in his affidavit that he hails from Theni District and had fallen in love with the detenue and that they got married on 14.06.2013 at Arulmighu Vadapalani Murugan Temple in Chennai and that the marriage was registered under the Tamil Nadu Registration of Marriage Act, 2009 with
Bhaurao Versus State of Maharashtra [AIR 1965 SC 1564]
Latha Singh Versus State of Uttar Pradesh [AIR 2006 SC 2522]
Pandurang Dattatraya Khandekar Versus Bar Council of Maharashtra [1984 (2) SCC 556]
Prithipal Singh Versus State of Punjab [2012 (1) SCC 10]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.