1. The Appellant/Third Party has preferred the instant Criminal Appeal in Crl.A.No.224 of 2014 as against the order dated 11.03.2014 in unnumbered I.A.SR.No.82 of 2014 in I.A.No.3 of 2013 in O.A.No.12 of 1999 passed by the Learned Special Judge {under TNPID Act, (in F.E.S) 1997}, Chennai.

2. The Appellant/Third Party has preferred the instant Criminal Appeal in Crl.A.No.225 of 2014 as against the order dated 11.03.2014 in unnumbered I.A.SR.No.83 of 2014 in I.A.No.3 of 2013 in O.A.No.12 of 1999 passed by the learned Special Judge {under TNPID Act, (in F.E.S) 1997}, Chennai.

3. The trial Court while passing the impugned order in unnumbered I.A.SR.No.82 of 2014 and in unnumbered I.A.SR.No.83 of 2014 in I.A.No.No.3 of 2013 in O.A.No.12 of 1999 on 11.03.2014, in paragraph – 8 had observed the following:-

“It is pertinent to mention here that the 3rd respondent in the petition already had been filed I.A.No.129/2005 to evict the encroachers in respect of Survey No.927/1C, 920/1A and 920/B and the same was allowed by this Court after disposal of I.A.No.129/2005., the Collector of Chennai, District Revenue Officer, Thiruvallur have not taken any steps to effect the encroachers sub