K.RAVICHANDRA BAABU
N. Saravanan – Appellant
Versus
Manujothi Ashramam, Head Quarters at Sathya Nagaram – Respondent
1. The petitioner is the sixth defendant in the suit. The said suit was filed by the first respondent herein as plaintiff for declaration that no right, title and interest is conveyed under document No.1705/83, dated 6.5.1983 to defendants 3 to 7 who are the legal heirs of the deceased K.N. Nataraja Iyer and also for declaration that no right, title and interest is conveyed under document No.1704/83, dated 9.5.1983 to the second defendant. Pending the said suit, the sixth defendant filed application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC for rejection of the plaint on the grounds that the suit is barred by limitation; there was no cause of action for filing the said suit and the suit is under-valued. The trial Court dismissed the said application. Challenging the same, the present Civil Revision Petition is filed by the sixth defendant.
2. The case of the plaintiff in the said suit, in short, is as follows:
The plaintiff-Ashramam, registered under the Societies Registration Act, came into being on 19.12.1963. The plaintiff-Ashramam is owning lands measuring an extent of 5.02 cents in S.No.165/2 situated in No.174, Rajakilpakkam Village, Tambaram Taluk, by virtue of a deed of settlement, d
Shah Babulal Khimji Versus Jayaben D. Kania
Liverpool & London S.P.& I. Assn. Ltd. Versus M.V. Sea Success I
Chandra Versus Reddappa Reddy and others
Consolidated Engg. Enterprises Versus Principal Secy. Irrigation Deptt.
C. Natrajan Versus Ashim Bai and another (2008 (1) MLJ 1278 : 2007 (12) SCALE 163)
Ram Bhawan Singh Versus Jagdish
Popat and Kotecha Property Versus State Bank of India Staff Association
P. Thillai Selvan Versus Shyna Paul
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.