V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN
M. Aamira Fathima – Appellant
Versus
Annamalai University, Annamalai Nagar, rep. by its Administrator – Respondent
1. The petitioners in one writ petition joined the first year of the MBBS degree course in Raja Muthiah Medical College, which is a constituent of the Annamalai University, in the academic year 2013-14. The petitioners in the other writ petition joined the first year of the B.D.S. course in the same university in the academic year 2013-14. The petitioners in both the writ petitions have now moved over to the second year of the respective courses.
2. In 2013-14 when the petitioners joined the above courses, the University was governed by the provisions of the Annamalai University Act, 1928 and the students of M.B.B.S. were required to pay Rs. 5,54,370/- and the students of B.D.S. were required to pay Rs.3,50,370/- towards fees as determined by the Senate and as indicated in the Prospectus for the year 2013-14. But certain ugly and unfortunate events that happened in quick succession from November 2012, culminated in the State of Tamilnadu passing the Annamalai University Act, 2013 repealing the 1928 Act. Under the new enactment, the State assumed complete control of the University, removing the role played by the Founder's family till then.
3. Therefore, when the academic year 20
T.M.A. Pai Foundation Versus State of Karnataka [2002 (8) SCC 481]
Unni Krishnan Versus State of Andhra Pradesh [1993 (1) SCC 645]
St.Stephens College Versus University of Delhi [1992 (1) SCC 558]
Islamic Academy of Educational and another Versus State of Karnataka and others [(2003) 6 SCC 697)]
Cochin University of Science and Technology v Thomas P. John and others [(2008) 8 SCC 82]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.