SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Mad) 4294

PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA
Petitioner – Appellant
Versus
Respondent – Respondent


JUDGMENT

PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J.

1. The defendant in C.S. No. 63 of 2014 has taken out this application seeking to reject the plaint in the above suit filed by the respondent/plaintiff claiming a sum of Rs. 27,80,895/- with interest.

2. The case of the plaintiff, as narrated in the plaint, is that an offer of employment extended on 06.9.2010 by the defendant Company for the post of Manager – Customer Service (Collections) was withdrawn unilaterally on 25.9.2010 in an arbitrary and unreasonable manner. Hence, the suit has been filed claiming the above sum as compensation.

3. Though the defendant has filed the written statement denying the claim of the plaintiff, has come up with this application to reject the plaint contending that the plaint does not disclose a cause of action and the suit is barred by limitation and that the suit itself is an abuse of judicial process. The applicant/defendant further contended that the offer was given to the respondent/plaintiff on condition that the acceptance, in writing, should be given within three days from the date of offer and to join the duty on or before 20.9.2010. According to the applicant, the respondent had received the offer letter



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top