P.DEVADASS
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. , Head Office, New Delhi, Rep by its Divisional Manager, Tuticorin – Appellant
Versus
P. S. T. S & Sons Pvt Ltd. , Agents of the Vessel, M. V. C. Express E. P. R. 024, Tuticorin-1 – Respondent
1. The Plaintiff in O.S.No.138 of 998, who has succeeded before the trial Court/Sub Court, Thoothukudi since became unsuccessful in the defendant’s First Appeal in A.S.No.119 of 2004 before the Additional District Court, (Fast Track Court-I), Thoothukudi is before us.
2. Second plaintiff/second appellant placed orders with the foreign stream linerviz., Pacific International Lines (PTE) Ltd., Tokyo, Japan for the supply of certain stainless steel scraps from Tokyo, Japan. The consignment was loaded in the vessel of the said foreign company at a Japanese Port on 17.10.1996. The company issued bill of leading. On 15.11.1996 at the port of Tuticoirn the vessel discharged the consignment. There was short landing of cargo to the extent of 2,950Kg. In pursuance of a contract of insurance, the second plaintiff made a claim with the first plaintiff Insurance Company. On 19.03.1997, the insurer paid the assured Rs.1,41,590/- The Insurer subrogated to the assured/second plaintiff. The Insurer laid the suit in O.S.No.138 of 1998 on the allegation that the defendant an Agent of the said Sea Carrier viz., Pacific International Lines(PTE) Ltd., Tokyo, Japan and claimed the said Rs.1,41,590
Appasamy v. Samy Lourde Joseph (2008) 3 MLJ 367 [Para 11(iv)]
B. Suresh Chand v. State of Tamil Nadu (2006) 4 MLJ 850 (Considered) [Paras 31
Arbee and Company, Madras v. Shri Govind Dall Mills (2001) 2 MLJ 687 (Cited) [Paras 11(iii), 20
Link International v. Mandya National Paper Mills Ltd. AIR 2005 SC 1417(Distinguished) [Paras 9
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.