SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Mad) 111

R.SUBBIAH
Vasumathi H. Shah – Appellant
Versus
Pushpa Raju – Respondent


JUDGMENT

R. SUBBIAH, J.

1. This application has been filed by the applicant/plaintiff under Order 14 Rule 8 of O.S. Rules r/w Order VII Rule 11(d) of CPC r/w Section 151 of CPC seeking to reject the plaint.

2. The applicant is the defendant and the respondent is the plaintiff in the suit. For the sake of convenience, the parties will be referred as per their rankings in the suit.

3. The respondent/plaintiff has filed the suit for the following reliefs.

(i) To direct the defendant to execute a Sale Deed in favour of the plaintiff on receipt of the balance sale consideration in respect of the suit schedule premises, under the Agreement for Sale dated 25.03.2010, failing which, to direct the Registrar of this Court to execute the Sale Deed on behalf of the defendant in favour of the plaintiff.

(ii) To grant an order of permanent injunction, restraining the defendant, her men, agents, representatives or anyone claiming on her behalf, from alienating, encumbering or entering into any sale agreement in favour of any third party in respect of the suit schedule premises in any manner whatsoever, till the issue of specific performance is settled.

(iii) To direct the defendant to pay the costs of

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top