R. Mahadevan, J.

1. The appeal in O.S.A. No 243/2007 has been filed by the Defendant challenging the order dated 16.03.2006 in O.A 843 of 2005 appointing MrN.Harichandran, District Judge (Retired) as interim administrator of the plaintiff.

2. The Appeal in O.S.A No 74 of 2013 has been filed against the order dated 29.6.2012 in Application No.4907/2011 impleading the Mr.D.Abraham as 4th Defendant in the suit. The said D.Abraham has filed M.P No 1/2011 in O.S.A 243 of 2007 to implead himself as a respondent in the appeal.

3. The brief facts of the case are as follows:

A. The plaintiff is a company registered under the Companies Act and the object of the plaintiff is to promote siddha medicine and to attain that object, the plaintiff has been running a hospital and college. The plaintiff is governed by the bye-laws which provides for various regulations regarding the appointment and election of various office bearers including to the office of the president. The further case of the plaintiff is that several irregularities were committed by the defendant and some other members. When the defendant was appointed as Receiver in the suit in C.S No 1380/92, he committed several malpract