SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Mad) 2307

R.MALA
Muthu Pillai – Appellant
Versus
Kasi Pillai – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For Appellants : Mr. Y. Jyothish Chander.
For Respondents: Mr. B. Vijayakumar.

JUDGMENT

This second appeal arises out of the Judgment and Decree 26.03.2004 in A.S.No.23 of 2000 on the file of the learned Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court-II, Kancheepuram, confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 24.12.1999 in O.S.No.157 of 1999 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Uthiramerur.

2. The averments made in the plaint are as follows:-

The suit property is a Natham Poromboke. The plaintiffs have put up a hut for their dwelling purpose as late in the year 1965 and they are in possession and enjoyment of the suit property measuring East to West 60 feet and North to South 100 feet. The plaintiffs were also paying the property tax for the said hut. The Special Tahsildar, Natham Survey, Uthiramerur, issued patta in favour of the first plaintiff in the year 1996. While so, on 05.10.1997 the defendants who have no manner of right, title or interest over the suit property, attempted to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaintiffs and removed the Velikathan trees from the suit proeprty. The plaintiffs have also lodged a police compla





















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top