SATISH K.AGNIHOTRI, M.VENUGOPAL
Kongunadu Hospitals (P) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Recovery Officer, Debt Recovery Tribunal-II – Respondent
SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI, J.
The instant writ petition is filed by the auction purchaser, seeking a direction to the first respondent-Recovery Officer to receive a sum of Rs.1,15,00,000/- deposited by way of demand draft from the petitioner in the light of the condition No.VI of paragraph 29 in the common order dated 25.02.2009 passed in W.P.No.6131, 6149, 6662 of 2005, 23002 and 49641 of 2006 and C.R.P.(NPD)Nos.1807 and 1808 of 2006 and to issue possession certificate in favour of the petitioner.
2. The brief facts relevant for adjudication of the disputes, as projected by the petitioner, are that the secured financial institution, Indian Overseas Bank (for short “IOB”), to recover outstanding dues of Rs.25 lakhs from the third respondent, obtained an ex parte final order dated 31.5.2004 of the Debts Recovery Tribunal-II, Chennai in O.A.No.304 of 2003 filed by it. Being aggrieved, several writ petitions were filed by the Bank, guarantor and borrower before this Court. In the meantime, the said property was put on public auction held on 2.3.2006, which was confirmed by issuance of sale certificate in favour of the petitioner /auction purchaser on 3.3.2006. The division bench of this
Annapurna Vs. Mallikarjun and another
Nava Bharat Ferro Alloys Limited Vs. Transmission Corporation of Andhra Pradesh Limited and another
Anandilal and another Vs. Ram Narain and others
Union of India and others Vs. West Coast Paper Mills Ltd and another
Delhi Development Authority Vs. Skipper Construction Co. (P) Ltd. and another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.