This Appeal has been filed by the plaintiffs against the concurrent findings of the courts below rejecting the claim of the plaintiffs.

2. The brief facts of the case are as follows: The suit was filed by the plaintiffs contending that the suit property was originally purchased by the 3rd plaintiff in the name of his son, the defendant in 1976 to make a responsible person and to improve his marriage prospects. Subsequently, an irrevocable settlement deed dated 09.09.1981 was executed by the defendant in favour of the 3rd plaintiff. The 3rd plaintiff claimed to be in possession from the date of settlement and commenced the construction. Instigated by his wife and in-laws, the defendant has cancelled the settlement deed on 21.01.1982 without the consent and knowledge of the 3rd plaintiff. The fact of cancellation came to the knowledge of the 3rd plaintiff only through the notice dated 30.12.1992 sent by the defendant's lawyer. Subsequently on.19.01.1996, the 3rd plaintiff has sold the suit property in favour of the 1st and 2nd plaintiffs and they were put in possession of the suit property. The plaintiffs also contended that the defendant and his henchmen tried to dispossess