SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Mad) 2191

K.KALYANASUNDARAM
M. Kesavan – Appellant
Versus
A. Jayaraman – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. T.R. Rajaraman
Mr. V. Shanmugam

Order

These civil revision petitions have been filed against the order dated 15.09.2010 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Poonamallee, in E.A.No.29 of 2010 in E.P.No.63 of 2009 in O.S.No.21 of 1994.

2. The petitioner in CRP.NPD.No.142 of 2012 and the respondent in CRP.NPD.No.3249 of 2013 had instituted the suit against the respondent in CRP.NPD.No.142 of 2012 and the petitioner in CRP.NPD.No.3249 of 2013 for specific performance. After trial, the suit was decreed on 11.04.2000. Aggrieved by the Judgment and Decree, the defendant preferred an appeal in A.S.No.302 of 2000 before this Court. During the pendency of the appeal, a settlement was reached between the parties and a fresh agreement of sale dated 30.07.2008 was entered into between the parties. In pursuance of the agreement, the appeal was withdrawn as settled out of Court.

3. As per the agreement of sale dated 30.07.2008, the decree holder has agreed to pay to the Judgment Debtor a sum of Rs.2,10,00,000/- towards fresh sale consideration and complete the transaction within a period of three months. According to the Judgment Debtor, the Decree Holder has failed to comply with the terms and conditions of the agreement of s



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top