S.VIMALA
Pandi – Appellant
Versus
G. Sasikala – Respondent
S. Vimala, J.
"We are guilty of many errors and many faults, but our worst crime is abandoning the children, neglecting the fountain of life. Many of the things we need can wait. The child cannot. Right now is the time his bones are being formed, his blood is being made, and his senses are being developed. To him we cannot answer 'Tomorrow,' his name is today." - Gabriela Mistral
1. If instant justice is the need of the child, whether in an application for interim maintenance, the Court should pass ad-interim ex-parte order of interim maintenance under proviso to Section 125(1) Cr.P.C. is the issue canvassed in this revision petition. Aggrieved over the order of interim maintenance passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nilakottai, directing the revision petitioner to pay a sum of Rs. 2,500/- each to R1 and R2, who are the wife and the minor daughter of the revision petitioner respectively, this revision petition has been filed.
2. The respondents herein have filed an application for maintenance in M.C. No. 7 of 2015 before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nilakottai, Dindigul District. In M.C. No. 7 of 2015, an interlocutory application has been filed in Cr. M.P. No. 6377
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.