SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Mad) 3433

S.VIMALA
Pandi – Appellant
Versus
G. Sasikala – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : R. Anand

ORDER :

S. Vimala, J.

"We are guilty of many errors and many faults, but our worst crime is abandoning the children, neglecting the fountain of life. Many of the things we need can wait. The child cannot. Right now is the time his bones are being formed, his blood is being made, and his senses are being developed. To him we cannot answer 'Tomorrow,' his name is today." - Gabriela Mistral

1. If instant justice is the need of the child, whether in an application for interim maintenance, the Court should pass ad-interim ex-parte order of interim maintenance under proviso to Section 125(1) Cr.P.C. is the issue canvassed in this revision petition. Aggrieved over the order of interim maintenance passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nilakottai, directing the revision petitioner to pay a sum of Rs. 2,500/- each to R1 and R2, who are the wife and the minor daughter of the revision petitioner respectively, this revision petition has been filed.

2. The respondents herein have filed an application for maintenance in M.C. No. 7 of 2015 before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nilakottai, Dindigul District. In M.C. No. 7 of 2015, an interlocutory application has been filed in Cr. M.P. No. 6377
































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top