SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Mad) 3474

SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, T.S.SIVAGNANAM
A. Asuvathaman – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.

The petitioner, an advocate by profession, a married one, seeks to assail the provision of Section 7-A of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 as amended by the Hindu Marriage (Madras Amendment) Act, 1967.

2. The plea of the petitioner is that it is after a great debate and discussion, the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 was enacted, setting out the essentials of a Hindu marriage. In that context, the petitioner has referred to the provision of Section 7, which reads as under:

'7. Ceremonies for a Hindu marriage.- (1) A Hindu marriage may be solemnized in accordance with the customary rites and ceremonies of either party thereto.

(2) Where such rites and ceremonies include the saptapadi (that is, the taking of seven steps by the bridegroom and the bride jointly before the sacred fire), the marriage becomes complete and binding when the seventh step is taken.'

3. It is accepted by the petitioner that in terms of the provision of the aforesaid Section, a Hindu marriage may be solemnized in accordance with the customary rites and ceremonies as per sub-section (1) of Section 7. Sub-section (2) of Section 7 only stipulates where saptapadi is included in such rights and c
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top