M.VENUGOPAL
Kannamma – Appellant
Versus
State rep. By its Inspector of Police Deevattipatty Police Station Salem District – Respondent
The Revision Petitioner/Defacto Complainant has preferred the instant Criminal Revision Petition before this Court, as against the order, dated 8/12/2015 passed in Crl.M.P.No.990 of 2015, in Crime No.148 of 2015 by the Learned District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Omalur, Salem District.
2. The Learned District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Omalur, Salem District, while passing the impugned order in Crl.M.P.No.990 of 2015 (filed by the Revision Petitioner/Defacto Complainant as petitioner), at paragraph 4, had inter alia observed that
“... In the present petition, the gold jewels sought for by the petitioner is of different varieties and in receipt note book produced by the petitioner and in note books, the weight of the jewels and the weight of the jewels produced by the Investigating Officer, there is a difference and further, in the complete statement of the Petitioner, the Petitioner had only stated a sum of Rs.4,50,000/-alone was lost by means of theft and also in the Petition, only a sum of Rs.8,57,520/-was only prayed for to be returned and added further, in respect of the aforesaid amount/money, one Narayanan had filed Crl.M.P.No.2722 of 2015, claiming the entire
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.