SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, R.MAHADEVAN
Poompuhar Shipping Corporation Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Madurai – Respondent
Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J.
1. The benefit extended to workmen in the appellant/Corporation in the form of incentive payment for extra performance during regular working hours is sought to be included as part of basic wage in terms of the impugned order giving rise to the present appeal.
2. The factual position is really not in dispute. The Appellant Corporation is engaged in the business of transportation of coal by sea and unloading the coal in Tuticorin for the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board to generate power for supply of electricity. The appointment orders show that the initial appointment as trainees for a period of two months is on stipendiary basis and after confirmation, they are appointed in the appropriate scale of pay with dearness allowance admissible under the Rules of the Appellant Corporation. In addition to these emoluments, the workmen are eligible for monthly incentive payments on the basis of the appellant's scheme of incentive payments in force at the time. This incentive payment is to be on the basis of the output from the cranes during each shift. For clarity, this incentive is payable not for any extra hours work, but in the regular working time period. Thu
The Daily Partap v. The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Punjab
Harihar Polyfibres v. The Regional Director, ESI Corporation
Jay Engineering Works Ltd. and others v. Union of India and others
Titaghur Paper Mills Co. Ltd. v. Workmen
Regional Commissioner, EPF v. Management of Southern Alloy Foundries (P) Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.