Sudhakar [A1] vs State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Meenambakkam Airport Police Station, Chennai

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2016 Supreme(Mad) 3032

S.NAGAMUTHU, V.BHARATHIDASAN
Sudhakar [A1] – Appellant
Versus
State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Meenambakkam Airport Police Station, Chennai – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. V.C.Gopinath, Senior Counsel for Mr. Sasikumar, Mr. S.Ananthanarayanan, Mr. Sasikumar Adv.
For the Respondent: Mr. V.M.R.Rajendran, Adv.

JUDGEMENT :

S. NAGAMUTHU, J.

The appellants in Crl.A.No.406 of 2014 are Accused Nos.1 to 3 and the sole appellant in Crl.A.No.397 of 2014 is Accused No.4 in S.C.No.694 of 2005 on the file of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Chengalpattu. The trial court framed as many as eight charges against the accused as detailed below:-

Charge Number	Charges framed against	Penal provision under which charge framed
1	A1 to A3	Section 120(B) of IPC
2	A1 to A3	Section 302 r/w 34 of IPC
3	A1 to A3	Section 201 of IPC
4	A1 to A3	Section 392 r/w 397 of IPC
5	A4	Section 465 of IPC
6	A4	Section 468 of IPC
7	A1 to A3	Section 465 r/w 109 of IPC

The trial court, by judgement dated 17.07.2014, convicted and sentenced the accused under various penal provisions as detailed below:-

Rank of the Accused	Penal provision under which conviction recorded	Quantum of Sentence Imposed
A1 to A3	Section 120(B) of IPC	Rigorous Imprisonment for ten years and a fine of Rs.10,000/- each in default to suffer s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2016 Supreme(Mad) 3032

S.NAGAMUTHU, V.BHARATHIDASANSudhakar [A1] – AppellantVersusState Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Meenambakkam Airport Police Station, Chennai – Respondent

Cases Referred (2)

S.NAGAMUTHU, V.BHARATHIDASAN
Sudhakar [A1] – Appellant
Versus
State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Meenambakkam Airport Police Station, Chennai – Respondent