M.VENUGOPAL
A. Subramani – Appellant
Versus
Inspector of Police Vigilance and Anti-Corruption, Salem – Respondent
Heard the Learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner/A.2 and the Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the Respondent.
2. The Petitioner/A.2 has preferred the present Criminal Revision Petition before this Court, (as an aggrieved person) as against the Order dated 05.11.2015 in Crl.M.P.No.116 of 2014 in Spl.C.CNo.102 of 2014 on the file of Learned Special Judge, (Special Court for Trial Cases, under Prevention of Corruption Act) Salem.
3. The Learned Special Judge, (Special Court for Trial of Cases under the Prevention of Corruption Act) Salem on 05.11.2015 in Crl.M.P.No.116 of 2014 in Spl.C.C. No.102 of 2014 at Paragraph No.18 had observed the following:-
“18. In the present case the materials placed by the Investigating Officer along with the Final Report prima facie disclose grave suspicion against the petitioner of having committed the offences alleged in the Final Report. Hence by applying the ration laid down by our Apex Court in the case referred supra this Court decides that there is no merit in the application and that the petitioner is not entitled for an order of discharge as prayed for.”
and ultimately dismissed the Criminal Miscellaneous Petition.
4. A
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.