S.MANIKUMAR, G.CHOCKALINGAM
Divisional Railway Manager/PL/MAS, Union of India, Southern Railway, Office of the Divisional Railway Manager – Appellant
Versus
Registrar, Central Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench – Respondent
S. Manikumar, J.
Challenge in this Writ Petition is to an order, made in O.A.No. 154 of 2015, dated 28.04.2015, by which, the Central Administrative Tribunal, quashed the order, dated 24.11.2014, of Assistant Commercial Manager/I/MAS, Commercial Branch, Chennai Division, Chennai, 2nd appellant herein, transferring the 2nd respondent from Chennai Division to Salem Division.
2. Facts as per the case of the 2nd respondent are that on 01.04.2014, when he was on duty in Sampark Kranti Express train, he excessed the passenger, viz., Rasmi Gupta, for transfer of ticket, as she was travelling on the ticket issued in the name of one Abishek Nagar (M/22), along with two other passengers, viz., Swetank Sharma and Swati Bansal. Mother of Swathi Bansal prevented him, from claiming excess amount for transfer of ticket, as per the Railway rules in force, using the name of Ex. Railway Minister, Sri. Pawan Kumar Bansal and all of them threatened him, that he would face dire consequences. But the 2nd respondent did his duty and charged due fare, through Excess Fee Ticket No. 0335579 for Rs.3,510/-. Before reaching Vijayawada, he received a message from the Depot, Commercial Control/MAS, and
Chief Engineer (Personnel), TNEB v. K. Raman
S. Sevugan v. The Chief Educational Officer, Virudhunagar District
Registrar General, High Court of Judicature of Madras v. R. Perachi
National Hydroelectric Power Corporation Ltd., v. Shri Bhagwan
S. Sevugan v. The Chief Educational Officer
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.