P.N.PRAKASH
Saranya – Appellant
Versus
State by Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station Perambalur and District – Respondent
P.N. Prakash, J.
This petition has been filed to set aside the order dated 18.03.2016 made in Crl.M.P.No. 25 of 2016 in Special S.C.No. 17 of 2015 on the file of the District Judge/Mahila Court, Perambalur.
2. The seminal question that falls for determination in this case is "Can a criminal Court direct a prosecution witness and her child to subject themselves to DNA profiling along with the accused?"
3. Before venturing to answer this question, it is essential to narrate the factual matrix of this case.
4. For the sake of convenience, the parties will be referred to by their name.
5. On the complaint lodged by one Prema, the All Women Police Station, Perambalur, registered a case in Cr.No. 7 of 2015 on 12.03.2015 under Sections 417, 376, 294(b) and 506(i) IPC; Section 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (for brevity "the POCSO Act") and Sections 9, 10 and 11 of Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006 against (1) Manikandan (2) Karuppayee [mother of Manikandan], (3) Anjalai
[sister of Manikandan] and (4) Arumugam [relative of Manikandan].
6. Prema, a 21 year old village belle and Manikandan, aged about 27 years, were neck deep in love some time around 201
Bhabani Prasad Jena v. Orissa State Commission for Women
Dipanwita Roy v. Ronobroto Roy
Nandlal Wasudeo Badwaik v. Lata Nandlal Badwaik
R. Dineshkumar alias Deena v. State rep. by Inspector of Police
Rajaram Prasad Yadav v. State of Bihar
Sakiri Vasu v. State of Uttar Pradesh
State of Bombay v. Kathi Kalu Oghad
U.T. of Dadra & Nagar Haveli v. Fatehsinh Mohansinh Chauhan
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.