SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Mad) 3722

T.RAVINDRAN
M. Panneerselvam – Appellant
Versus
Susseela – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Y. Jyothish Chander
For the Respondents: Mr. M.s. Krishnan, M/s. Sarvabhouman.

JUDGMENT :

Challenge in this second appeal is made by the first defendant against the judgement and decree dated 27.10.2010 made in A.S.No.7 of 2006 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Thiruvellore, confirming the judgement and decree dated 29.07.2005 made in O.S.No.158 of 1992 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Thiruttani.

2. The suit has been laid for declaration and permanent injunction.

3. The case of the plaintiffs, in brief, is as follows:

The defendants 2 and 3 are the father and mother of the plaintiffs 1 to 3. The 4th defendant is the brother of the second defendant. The plaintiffs 1 to 3 are minors and are represented by their paternal aunt R.Gethari, who is the sister of the defendants 2 &4. The suit property and other properties originally belonged to Kamakshiammal wife of C.V. Rajamanickam Mudaliar of Kalambakkam village. Kamakshiammal executed a registered Will dated 13.02.1976 bequeathing life interest in the suit property to the second defendant together with a vacant site therein. Under the above said Will, the second defendant has got only life interest in the suit property and the vested remainder belongs to the plaintiffs. The second defendant has no right



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top