SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(Mad) 156

GOVINDA MENON, RAMASWAMI GOUNDER
Sankaranarayana Pillai – Appellant
Versus
Kandasamia Pillai – Respondent


Advocates:
T.R. Mani for Petitioners.
M. Natesan for Respondent.

Panchapakesa Ayyar, J.†-This is a petition by the defendants in O.S. No. 131 of 1954 on the file of the District Munsiff, Tenkasi, to revise the findings of the District Munsiff on issues 6 and 7 in the suit. Those issues run as follows:

Issue 6. Whether the suit is not properly valued and correct court-fee not paid ?

Issue 7. Whether this Court has no jurisdiction to try the suit?

The suit was filed by the plaintiff respondent for possession of his 1/6th share in the plaint 1 and 2 schedule lands including the trees and the well on them. The plaintiff’s mother and guardian had executed two sale-deeds in respect of the plaint schedule properties. Exhibit B-1 dated 8th January, 1938, was a registered sale-deed for Rs. 750 executed by the plaintiff’s mother, Pachaivadivammal, as natural guardian of the plaintiff, in favour of the 1st defendant and others. Exhibit B-2 was sale-deed executed on the same day, by the same lady as natural guardian of the plaintiff for Rs.750 in favour of the 2nd defendant. Within 3 years of his attaining majority, the plaintiff filed the suit for recovery of possession of his 1/6th share in the plaint schedule properties from the defendants, for mesne profi













































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top