SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MADRAS HIGH COURT
Sanjay Kishan Kaul, M. Sathyanarayanan, T.S. Sivagnanam, JJ.
T.K.Shanmugam Secretary, C.P.I. (M) North Chennai District Committee - Petitioner
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu Rep., by its Secretary to Govt., Department of Revenue - Respondent
W.P. No. 1294 of 2009
Decided On : 30-10-2015

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: N.G.R. Prasad for M/s. S. Sivakumar, J. Prataban
For the Respondent: P.H. Arvind Pandian, V.R. Kamalanathan, K. Rajasrinivas, N. Ramesh, S. Shinu, V.N. Santha Ram, Naveen Kumar Murthi (Amicus Curiae)

Headnote:

Constitution of India – Article 21, 14, 19 and 21 – Certain provisions of Tank Act – Sections 4 to 10 –Eviction of Encroachment Act, 2007 –Tamil Nadu Protection of Tanks – Abruptly and Arbitrarily – Tamil Nadu Protection of Tanks – Illegal – Regularisation of Encroachments – Petitioner seeks to canvass case of encroachers in the lands in question and seeks for a direction to Revenue Authorities to grant patta to them in accordance with Government Orders – Petitioner is said to have submitted a representation Chief Minister to grant patta to encroachers in lakes/water bodies, which no longer retain the characteristic of a water body representation was submitted with reference to subject encroachment and a request was made for grant of patta by reclassifying land in question petitioner would state that Greater Chennai consists of Chennai Corporation area – Held, Second and more disturbing aspect is that the minimum period of illegal occupation was abruptly and arbitrarily reduced to five years and further reduced to three years and there is absolutely no justification for reducing the period of illegal occupation to get the benefit of regularization – Article is not only fundamental in governance of country but a duty on the State to apply these principles in making laws and further to be kept in mind in understanding scope and purport of fundamental rights guaranteed by Constitution including and also various laws enacted by Parliament and State Legislatures. But unfortunately – State by passing above said Government Orders actively encourages encroachers of water bodies to indulge in illegal and unlawful activities and also bent upon regularising their possession which has to be deprecated –Petition disposed.

ORDER :

Sanjay Kishan Kaul, M. Sathyanarayanan, T.S. Sivagnanam, JJ.

The petitioner, Secretary of a political party, has filed this Writ Petition designed as a Public Interest Litigation praying for a direction upon the Collector, Chennai District and the Collector, Thiruvallur District, respondents 3 and 4 herein to grant patta and regularise the encroachment in Survey Nos.1, 2 and 4 (Parts) in No.60, Menambedu Village and in Survey No.813 in No.61, Korattur Village, Ambattur Taluk in terms of Government Orders in G.O.Ms. No. 854, dated 30.12.2006, read with G.O. Ms. No. 579, dated 03.10.2008, issued by the Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu, Department of Revenue, the first respondent in terms of the decision of the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Sivakasi Region Tax Payers Association v. State of Tamil Nadu reported in 2008 (5) MLJ 1425.

2. Before we go into the point of reference laid before the Full Bench, it would be necessary to have a prelude on the factual scenario. The petitioner seeks to canvass the case of the encroachers in the lands in question and seeks for a direction to the Revenue Authorities to grant patta to them in accordance with the Government Orders dated 30.12.2006 and 03.10.2008. The petitioner is said to have submitted a representation on 17.12.2007 to the Hon'ble Chief Minister to grant patta to the encroachers in lakes/water bodies, which no longer retain the characteristic of a water body. On 18.06.2008, a representation was submitted with reference to the subject encroachment in Korattur Eri and a request was made for grant of patta by reclassifying the land in question. The petitioner would state that Greater Chennai consists of Chennai Corporation area and about 176 sq.kms of Thiruvallur District and 376sq. kms of Kancheepuram District. It is further stated that North Chennai area extends to about 464.53 sq. kms and the density of the population is quite high. The petitioner would state that the Government issued G.O. Ms. No. 854, which was a great reprieve for the weaker sections of the society and about 40,000 families submitted applications for grant of patta. Though G.O. Ms. No. 854 was a one time scheme for regularising the encroachments, subsequently, vide G.O.Ms. No.579, the scheme was extended upto 30.09.2009. The petitioner would state that the encroachers in the subject area had also submitted applications for grant of patta in terms of G.O.Ms. No. 854 and when those applications were pending, eviction notices were issued to the encroachers between November 2007 and July 2008 stating that the encroachment is in a water body and this notice appears to have been issued pursuant to directions of the First Bench in W.P. No. 25776 of 2006 and W.P.No.17915 of 1993, dated 04.10.2007. Those Writ Petitions were filed as Public Interest Litigations seeking for Writ of Declaration to declare the encroachments in water bodies and water courses, construction made thereon either with permission of the State by way of reclassification or issuance of patta or without permission of the State to be declared illegal, unconstitutional and crime against mankind and consequently for direction to remove all types of encroachment, restore all water bodies or water course to their original shape, size, capacity etc., and to initiate departmental and/or criminal action against the erring officials. The Writ Petition were disposed of by issuing the following directions:-

7. Having considered the difficulties expressed by the learned Government Pleader in carrying out the process of removal of encroachments, we pass the following the order:

(i) The secretaries, Public Works Department, in consultation with the respective District Collectors, are directed to decide the programme of evicting the encroachments in the water bodies falling in Categories 'A' and 'B' referred to above, by the end of November, 2007 and complete the process of removal of above, by the end of May, 2008. (emphasis supplied)

(ii) T










































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top