SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

S.NAGAMUTHU
Loganayaki – Appellant
Versus
V. Sivakumar – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. S. Mukunth, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. D. Prabhu Mukuth, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

S. Nagamuthu, J.

An important question as to whether an order for maintenance pendente lite passed under Section 24 of The Hindu Marriage Act, by a civil court [other than Family Courts constituted under The Family Courts Act, 1984] is appealable or not, has come up for consideration in this revision petition.

2. The petitioner is the wife of the respondent. The respondent has filed HMOP No. 119 of 2009 on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Ranipet, Vellore District, for divorce. Pending the said case, the petitioner filed an interlocutory application in I.A. No. 39 of 2010 seeking maintenance pendente lite at Rs.6,000/- per month and litigation expenses of Rs.15,000/- from the respondent. The learned Subordinate Judge, by his order dated 28.03.2011, dismissed the same. Aggrieved over the same and contending that the said order is not appealable, the petitioner has come up with this revision under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.

3. I have heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the records carefully.

4. At the outset, the learned counsel for the respondent raised a preliminary objection in respect of the maintainability of this revision. Accordi






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top