SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(MP) 36

C.P.SEN, P.C.PATHAK
RAGHVENDRA SINGH CHOUDHARY – Appellant
Versus
SEEMA BAI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.D.PATHAK, P.D.TIVARI, V.S.CHAUDHARY

C. P. SEN, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal by the appellant/husband under Cl. 10 of the Letters Patent against the order granting pendente lite maintenance @ Rs. 250/- p. m. to the respondent/wife by the learned single Judge u/s. 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, in First Appeal No. 31/87.

( 2 ) THE appellant filed a petition for divorce u/s. 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act before the Additional District Judge, Narsinghpur. The respondent moved an application u/s. 24 of the Act in that petition for grant of maintenance pendente lite. The trial Court, after recording the evidence adduced by the parties, granted maintenance @ Rs. 100/- p. m. from the date of the Order. The decree for divorce was granted to the appellant by the trial Court and aggrieved by the decree, the respondent has preferred F. A. No. 31/87, which is pending in this court. She also moved an application u/s. 24 of the Act for payment of pendente lite maintenance @rs. 100/- p. m. It appears that the application was not opposed by the appellant, but the learned single Judge granted maintenance @ Rs. 250 p. m. besides Rs. 500/- towards the litigation expenses.

( 3 ) ACCORDING to the appellant the respondent having herself





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top