SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

G.M.AKBAR ALI
Nachammal – Appellant
Versus
S. Murugesan – Respondent


Advocates:
For applts. : Mr.R. Subramanian, Sr. Adv.
For respt. : Mr.R. Swaminathan

Common Judgment:-Review Applications are filed against the judgement and decree dated 20.1.2010 passed in S.A.No.780 and 781 of 2004 by this Court.

2. By a common judgment dated 20.1.2010 in S.A.Nos.780 and 781 of 2004, this Court dismissed the second appeals. The appellant has preferred the present review petitions on the following grounds,:

i) This court having accepted that the suit property is a Grama natham and that the occupier of the Grama natham becomes the owner of the property ought to have allowed the appeals thereby confirming the title to the appellants;

ii) This court having found that one Karuppa Naidu and thereafter, the appellants were in long possession of the suit property, ought to have held that the appellant's predecessor was the first occupier of Grama natham;

iii) The Court ought to have considered that the appellants have established possessory title.

3. Before adverting to the above grounds and the maintainability of the present review petition, let us see the brief facts of the case which is as follows:

The Review petitioner/appellants are the plaintiffs in O.S.No.309 of 1994 and the defendants in O.S.No.641 of 1995. They have filed the suit for declaration




















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top