The revision petitioners in all these three petitions are the father and his minor daughter who are the defendants in the suits O.S.264/2013, O.S.374/2013 and O.S.290/2013 pending on the file of Principal District Munsif, Thoothukudi.

2. The subject matter in all these revision petitions centres around 68 cents of land purchased on 03.03.2004 by G.Muniratnam, who is the first revision petitioner herein. After purchase, the first revision petitioner has executed a General Power of Attorney to one M.Sumathi w/o Murali on 15.07.2010 authorising her to deal with the said property as his Agent. Based on the power, his Agent Sumathi has sold 4 cents to her elder daughter Mallika on 26.07.2010. Soon thereafter, on 25.10.2010, the first revision petitioner has settled the property in the name of his minor daughter Sakthi Mageshwari, the second revision petitioner herein. According to the first revision petitioner, on settling the property in the name of his minor daughter, the General Power of Attorney dated 15.07.2010 executed by him in favour of Tmt.Sumathi got implicitly revoked under Section 207 of the Indian Contract Act and he also explicitly cancelled the power by informing hi