SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Mad) 1115

V.M.VELUMANI
Ezhilarasi – Appellant
Versus
Daniel Yuvasingh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. M.G. Sugumaran
For the Respondents: Mr. N. Karthikeyan

ORDER :

This Civil Revision Petition is filed against the fair and decreetal order dated 24.01.2017 made in I.A.No..13910 of 2014 in O.S.No.11343 of 2010 on the file of VII Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.

2. The petitioners are defendants 1 & 2, the 1st respondent is the plaintiff and the 2nd respondent is the 3rd defendant in the suit. The 1st respondent filed suit in C.S.No.921 of 2006 (transferred to City Civil Court and re-numbered as O.S.No.11343 of 2010) on the file of the VII Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai against the petitioners and the third respondent for recovery of money based on two promissory notes dated 12.02.2004. The petitioners and the second respondent filed written statement during November 2007 and are contesting the suit. Trial commenced, first respondent examined himself as P.W.1 and marked documents. He was cross examined by petitioners with regard to suit promissory notes. The first petitioner examined himself as D.W.1. When the suit was posted for further evidence, the petitioners filed I.A.No.11379 of 2014 under Order 7 Rule 11 (d) of CPC to reject the plaint on the ground that the plaint is not maintainable and is barred by limita
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top