N.SATHISH KUMAR
K. Bhaskaran – Appellant
Versus
Tmt. B. Pramila – Respondent
Aggrieved over the judgment and decree dated 10.10.2012 passed by the Additional District Judge, Kancheepuram at Chengalpet in O.S.No.6 of 2004, the defendants 1 and 5 have preferred the present appeal.
2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as per their ranking before the trial Court.
3. The plaintiffs filed a suit in O.S.No.6 of 2004 before the learned Additional District Judge, Kancheepuram District at Chengalpet for declaration of title, delivery of possession, future damages and also for permanent injunction and costs.
4. After contest, the suit was decreed declaring the plaintiffs title over the suit schedule properties and to deliver vacant possession and to pay future damages.
5. The brief facts of the case of the plaintiffs are as follows:
(i) 1st plaintiff is the wife of the 1st defendant and 2nd plaintiff is the daughter of the 1st plaintiff and 1st defendant. 5th defendant is the mother of the 1st defendant and defendants 3 and 4 are the tenants in the suit properties. The marriage between the 1st plaintiff and the 1st defendant was solemnized on 20.02.1994 at Chennai and out of wedlock, the 2nd plaintiff was born on 07.01.1995. The 1st defenda
ASOKAN V. LAKSHMIKUTTY AND OTHERS
SATYA PAL ANAND V. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTEHRS
LATIF ESTATE LINE INDIA LIMITED V. HADEEJA AMMAL
SUBHAS CHANDRA DAS MUSHBI V. GANGA PRASAD DAS MUSHIB AND OTHERS
V. LOGANATHAN V. THE SUB REGISTRAR
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.