N.SESHASAYEE
Chaudhary Avadhesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Volleyball Federation of India, Rep. by its General Secretary, Chennai – Respondent
1. These triple CMAs arise out of three separate interim orders of Arbitrator passed under Section 17 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act (hereinafter A & C Act). The details are as tabulated below.
CMA No.
A. No.
Filed by
Prayer
Decision of Arbitrator
2823/2016
1/2016
Respondent
Restraining the appellant from interfering with the conduct of volleyball tournaments
1(b) – Allowed
2824/2016
1/2016
Respondent
To permit the respondent to operate bank account
Allowed
2625/2016
2/2016
Appellant
Not to conduct any Volley Ball Tournament under the banner of VFI
Dismissed
2. The quintessential points in controversy are pivoted on a challenge to the legality of the aforesaid three interim orders of the arbitrator. Short is its scope yet shorter are not the extent of arguments it invited. Broadly, the arguments advanced can be divided into (a) a preludial part and (b) the controversy per se. The first part will be a brief na
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd., Vs Motorola India Private Ltd.
Firm Ashok Traders & another Vs Gurumukh Das Saluja & Others
Inder Sain Mittal Vs Housing Board, Haryana & Others
M/s Gas Authority of India Ltd., & another Vs. M/s Keti Constructions & others
M/s Sundaram Finance Ltd., Vs M/s NEPC Ltd.
N. Chellappan Vs Secretary, KSEB & another
Narayan Prasad Lohia Vs Nikunj Kumar Lohia & Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.