SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Mad) 569

N.SESHASAYEE
Chaudhary Avadhesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Volleyball Federation of India, Rep. by its General Secretary, Chennai – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. T.Ayyadurai, Additional Advocate General-II for Mr. A. Swaminathan
For the Respondent: Mr. J. Sivanandaraj for Mr. V. Sankaranarayan, Mr. P. Veena Suresh

JUDGMENT :

1. These triple CMAs arise out of three separate interim orders of Arbitrator passed under Section 17 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act (hereinafter A & C Act). The details are as tabulated below.

CMA No.

A. No.

Filed by

Prayer

Decision of Arbitrator

2823/2016

1/2016

Respondent

Restraining the appellant from interfering with the conduct of volleyball tournaments

1(b) – Allowed

2824/2016

1/2016

Respondent

To permit the respondent to operate bank account

Allowed

2625/2016

2/2016

Appellant

Not to conduct any Volley Ball Tournament under the banner of VFI

Dismissed

2. The quintessential points in controversy are pivoted on a challenge to the legality of the aforesaid three interim orders of the arbitrator. Short is its scope yet shorter are not the extent of arguments it invited. Broadly, the arguments advanced can be divided into (a) a preludial part and (b) the controversy per se. The first part will be a brief na





























































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top