SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Mad) 3849

S.VIMALA
Sagaya Arockiya Raj – Appellant
Versus
Ganesh Kumar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:N. Sathish Babu, Advocate
For the Respondent:J. Lawrance, Advocate

ORDER :

S. Vimala, J.

The petitioner/accused has filed the quash petition, seeking to quash STC No.794 of 2012 filed by the respondent herein pending on the file of learned Judicial Magistrate, Dindigul.

Brief Facts:

2. The accused approached the respondent for a loan of Rs.6 lakhs on 15.04.2012 for the marriage expenses of his sister. The respondent paid a sum of Rs.6 lakhs. The accused was not able to repay the amount within the agreed period of three months and therefore, he issued a cheque drawn on ICICI Bank, Dindigul dated 22.09.2012. When the cheque was presented for collection to the Central Bank of India on 25.09.2012, the cheque was returned with endorsement "insufficient funds". Thereafter, the respondent issued a notice through his counsel on 29.09.2012, demanding payment of the amount covered under the cheque. After receipt of the notice, accused/petitioner sent a reply denying the receipt of the cheque amount and also alleged that the respondent has no source to lend such huge money. The petitioner/accused failed to pay the amount within fifteen days after the receipt of the notice, as prescribed under Section 138(c) of the N.I. Act and therefore, complaint was filed on 1




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top