SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Mad) 1479

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
R. Subramanian, J.
Shevapet Sowrashtra Vidhyalaya Sabai Trust Represented by its President – Appellant
Versus
Sri Panduranganadhaswami Devasthanam Represented by its Trustees, V.H. Jagadeesh – Respondent
A.S. No. 500 of 2015
Decided On : 07-02-2017

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. D. Sivakumaran.
For the Respondent: Mr. V. Raghavachari.

Headnote:

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Order 7 - Rule 1 and Section 92 and 151 – Civil Suit - Suit for declaration and consequential relief of recovery of possession - Trustees committee members - Removing entire trustees, managing committee members, directors, presidents, secretary, cashier etc. of defendants organizations - Declaring that suit properties absolutely belong to plaintiff alone has got right and title over suit properties for benefit of entire Shevapet Sowrashtra community people - Declaring that plaintiff alone has got right to manage affairs and administration of defendants organisations and suit properties - Vesting suit properties in plaintiff - Plaintiff it is sole representative of entire Sowrashtra Community people in Shevapet, - Said community possessed properties, institutions, Organisations etc. which are maintained and managed by plaintiff Devasthanam through its Trustees - Plaintiff would claim that it is a Public Trust for benefit of entire Sowrashtra Community - Held, Court do not think that I will be justified in going into merits of the rival claims and to decide rights of persons who are not before Court - If I venture in to that arena, I will be doing so in absence of persons whose presence has been held to be necessary - Therefore, court not going into merits of rival contentions relating to nature, ownership of defendant societies, or existence or otherwise of Trusts - They have been rendered in the absence of proper parties and in absence of proper leave under Section 92 of CPC - In result, appeal is allowed and judgment and decree of Trial Court stand set aside and O.S. is dismissed for want of leave under Section 92 C.P.C. and for non-impleading of necessary parties - All other questions are left open to be decided in a proper proceedings, if parties choose to launch any - This application has been filed by defendants/appellants seeking leave to file certain documents as evidence under Order 41, Rule 27 CPC - Suit dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

R. Subramanian, J.

1. The defendants who suffered a decree for declaration and consequential relief of recovery of possession are the appellants. The suit in O.S. No. 73 of 2010 was filed by the respondent against the appellants, namely Shevapet Sowrashtra Vidhyalaya Sabai Trust and Shevapet Sowrashtra Maruthi Association seeking the following reliefs.

(a) removing the entire trustees, managing committee members, directors, presidents, secretary, cashier etc. of the defendants organisations;

(b) declaring that the suit properties absolutely belong to the plaintiff devasthanam and the plaintiff devasthanam alone has got the right and title over the suit properties for the benefit of the entire Shevapet Sowrashtra community people;

(c) declaring that the plaintiff devasthanam alone has got right to manage the affairs and administration of the defendants organisations and the suit properties;

(d) vesting the suit properties in the plaintiff devasthanam;

(e) directing the defendants, their presidents, secretaries, trustees committee members to deliver possession of the suit properties to the plaintiff devasthanam;

(f) directing the defendants to render accounts and inquiries of the defendants organisations to the plaintiff devasthanam and the Shevapet Sowrashtra community people;

(g) declaring that the suit properties and its income including accrued income in the hands of the defendants are to be handed over to the plaintiff devasthanam for the beneficial use of the Shevapet Sowrashtra community people as a whole;

(h) restraining the defendants and their men in any manner causing any damage to the suit properties and the management of the affairs of the defendants organisations;

2. According to the plaintiff it is the sole representative of the entire Sowrashtra Community people in Shevapet, Salem. The said community possessed properties, institutions, Organisations etc. which are maintained and managed by the plaintiff Devasthanam through its Trustees. The plaintiff would claim that it is a Public Trust for the benefit of the entire Sowrashtra Community, Shevapet, Salem.

3. The plaintiff Devasthanam owns various properties and in the list of properties, the plaintiff had added Sowrashtra Vidhyalaya Aided Middle School, Sowrashtra Vidhyala Aided Primary School, Sowrashtra Maruthi (Degappiyasa) Sangam (subsequently converted as Sevapet Sowrashtra Maruthi Association.) The properties that are the subject mater of the suit are as follows:

Description of property

"1st Item : In Salem West Regn. Dist., Salem Jt.3 Sub Regn. Dist. in Shevapet Manickam Pillai Street, the land and building bearing door No. 64, presently in the possession of the 1st defendant.

2nd Item : In Salem West Regn. Dist., Salem Jt.3 Sub Regn. Dist., in Shevapet, S. No. 48/1, 2, S. No. 54, 56, 70, 71 and S. No. 1, then S. No. 537, 538, 539, 547, 546 and 549, the land measuring 31,555 sft with the building constructed on this land with all fittings, fixtures and easement rights, present in the possession of the 2nd defendant."

4. According to the plaintiff, the 1st item of the suit properties originally were owned by Ramanujar Madam, which was managed by Vedhantha Sabai. During the year 1944, the suit property was gifted to the plaintiff Devasthanam. During the year 1945, the plaintiff Devasthanam constructed a building out of its own funds and from the contributions received from the entire Sowrashtra people of Shevapet and the new building was named as "Vittoba Nilayam". A school was established in the said building and the plaintiff Devasthanam has appointed a Managing Committee called as "Sowrashtra Vidhyalaya Sabai" to look after the day to day administration of the school.

5. The 1st defendant is the creation of the plaintiff for the purpose of managing the school. As years have rolled two schools came into existence namely, Sowrashtra Vidhyalaya Aided Middle School and Sowrashtra Vidhyalaya Aided Primary School. Both the schools are under the management of the Comm













































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top