SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Mad) 1752

S.VAIDYANATHAN
P. Amaravathi – Appellant
Versus
Government of Tamilnadu – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. V.P. Raja
For the Respondents:Mr. Akhil Akbar Ali, Government Advocate

ORDER :

1. The petitioner has come forward with this Writ Petition praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to pay a sum of Rs.19,00,000/- (Rupees nineteen lakhs only) as compensation excluding Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees one lakh only) already sanctioned as per the order passed in earlier W.P.No.7925 of 1995.

2. It is the case of the petitioner that she is the widow of late Pandian who died in Police custody. There are three daughters and one son for them, as informed by the learned counsel for the petitioner. The said Pandian was detained by the Police on 05.04.1995. It is averred by the petitioner that her husband has not committed any offence, much less the one alleged against him and as the death had occurred in the custody, the petitioner would be entitled to compensation of Rs.20 lakhs. By the earlier order passed by this Court on 14.08.1996 in W.P.No.7925 of 1995, a sum of Rs.1 lakh was directed by this Court to be paid by the respondents as interim compensation, which was paid and the said amount of Rs.1 lakh was directed by this Court to be adjus























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top