SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Mad) 2249

V.M.VELUMANI
Leena Menezes – Appellant
Versus
Mathana – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: M/s. J.R.K.Bhavanantham
For the Respondent: M/s. C.T.Mohan

ORDER :

This civil revision petition has been filed against the fair and decretal order dated 23.08.2011, made in I.A.No.1193 of 2011 in O.S.No.576 of 2004, on the file of the Additional District Munsif Court, Alandur.

2. The petitioner is plaintiff, respondents are the defendants in O.S.No.576 of 2004 on the file of the Additional District Munsiff, Alandur (Petitioner Originally filed O.S.No.171 of 1996, before the Subordinate Judge, Poonamallee). The Petitioner filed the said suit for declaration and permanent injunction, restraining the respondents from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit property. The first respondent did not file any written statement. The respondents 2 and 3 filed written statement on 07.09.1998 and are contesting the suit. Trial commenced. The petitioner filed proof affidavit and was examined in chief on 03.06.2008. Subsequently, she did not appear for cross examination on many occasions. The suit was dismissed for default on 15.04.2009.

3. The petitioner filed I.A.No.580 of 2009 for restoration of the suit to the file. But the petitioner did not pursue the same and the said I.A. was dismissed for default. Then an application file






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top