S.VAIDYANATHAN
Jegadammal (died), Kuppammal – Appellant
Versus
Munusamy – Respondent
The unsuccessful plaintiffs before both the Courts below, are the appellants herein. They challenge the judgment and decree of the trial Court in O.S.No.39 of 1991 in dismissing the suit, which had been confirmed by the lower appellate Court in A.S.No.39 of 1997.
2. It is the case of the appellants/plaintiffs that the first plaintiff is the wife of Thanja Gounder and the other two appellants are the daughters of the first plaintiff. The first and second defendants are the son and another daughter born to the first plaintiff and Thanja Gounder. It is the case of the plaintiffs that the entire properties belong to Thanja Gounder and they are self-acquired properties, and the said Thanja Gounder died intestate leaving behind the heirs, who are all parties in the suit and that they are entitled to equal shares in the property. As the defendants did not agree to the request of the plaintiffs, claiming 3/5 share in the plaint schedule property, after issuance of lawyer's notice, dated 19.11.1990, the plaintiffs have approached the trial Court for the relief of partition and allotment of respective shares.
3. The contesting first defendant contended before the Civil Court that his
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.