SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Mad) 3319

S.VAIDYANATHAN
Kumari – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Secretary to Government, Energy Department, Secretariat, Chennai – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:V.S. Senthil Kumar, Advocate.
For the Respondents:P.R. Dhilip Kumar, T.C. Gopalakrishnan, Advocates.

JUDGMENT :

1. The petitioner has come forward with this Writ Petition praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to grant appropriate compensation to the petitioner as this Court may deem fit and proper considering the facts and circumstances of the case.

2. It is the case of the petitioner that her late husband and herself have been residing in Chennai and her husband was an auto driver. They are blessed with two daughters (who are married) and one son. Her husband is the sole bread winner of the family. Her husband used to go to the near-by shop every day in the morning to buy milk and on 10.01.2013 at about 5.30 a.m., as usually, her husband went to the near-by shop to buy milk. Without knowing that the electricity cable was cut and lying on the road unattended, her husband stamped the electricity cable and due to high voltage current passing into him, he screamed loudly and fell on the road. The petitioner along with her son and few neighbours, rushed to the place of occurrence and saw the petitioner's husband lying on the road without any response.



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top