SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Mad) 3623

M.S.RAMESH
P. Raja – Appellant
Versus
P. Harikrishnan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:S. Doraisamy, Advocate.
For the Respondent:KTS. Sivakumar, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Mr.S.Doraisamy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.KTS.Sivakumar, learned counsel for the respondent.

2. The case of the petitioner is as follows:

On 07.07.2007 one Parameswari lodged a complaint before Manalurpettai police station which came to be registered by the Sub Inspector of Police in Cr.No.144 of 2007. The petitioner who was the then Inspector of Police, took up the investigation and after preparing mahazor and obtaining the statements of the witnesses, arrested the respondent herein who is the husband of the complainant Parameswari and remanded him to judicial custody. The case then came to be transferred to CBCID on the basis of orders of this Court in Crl.O.P.No.29737 of 2007 dated 12.11.2007. Subsequently, charge sheet came to be filed in S.C.No.135 of 2010 and after trial, the respondent was acquitted by the learned Judge, Fast Track Court, Villupuram on 26.09.2014. Pursuant to the acquittal, the petitioner herein has filed a private complaint under Sections 193, 195, 196, 109, 211 and 344 IPC in PRC.No.6 of 2015 which proceedings is challenged in this Criminal Original Petition.

3. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petiti











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top