SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(SC) 1052

V.GOPALA GOWDA, AMITAVA ROY
N. K. GANGULY – Appellant
Versus
CBI NEW DELHI – Respondent


Judgement Key Points

Key Points: - The judgment considers whether prior sanction under Section 197 CrPC is required before taking cognizance for offences allegedly committed in discharge of official duty. (!) (!) (!) - It discusses the legality and validity of cognizance taken without such sanction and quashing proceedings if sanction is mandatory and absent. (!) (!) (!) - It analyzes the scope of Section 197(1) CrPC, the concept of official duty, and how the act must relate to official functions to attract sanction protection. (!) (!) (!) (!)

How to determine whether prior sanction under section 197 CrPC is required to prosecute public servants for offences allegedly committed in discharge of official duty?

How to assess the legality and validity of taking cognizance in absence of prior sanction under section 197 CrPC?

What is the proper test to decide whether an act by a public servant, though connected to official duties, requires sanction for prosecution under section 197 CrPC?


Judgment

V. Gopala Gowda, J.

Delay condoned. Leave granted in Special Leave Petition (Crl) ……… Crl. M.P. No. 9612 of 2015.

2. These appeals arise out of the common judgment and order dated 27.05.2013 passed in Application Nos. 480 of 2013, 41206, 40718, 41006 and 41187 of 2012 and judgment and order by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dated and order 07.10.2014 passed in Application No. 277KH of 2014 in Special Case No. 18 of 2012 by the learned Special Judge, whereby the High Court dismissed the applications filed by the appellants herein under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as “the CrPC”) to quash the criminal proceedings of Special Case No. 18 of 2012 as well as the summoning order dated 08.11.2012 passed by the learned Special Judge, Anti Corruption, CBI, Ghaziabad. All the appeals are being disposed of by this common judgment.

3. As the facts in all the appeals are common, for the sake of convenience, we refer to the facts of Criminal Appeal No. 798 of 2015, in this judgment which are briefly stated hereunder:

4. The Indian Council of Medical Research (hereinafter referred to as “ICMR”), a registered society under the Societies










































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top