SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Mad) 3666

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
Mayilasalam – Appellant
Versus
Jayalkshmi @ Chinnammal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Hema Sampath, SC.
For the Respondents:L. Chandrakumar, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

1. This Review Application has been filed, seeking to review the judgment and decree, dated 17.12.2014, passed in SA.No.315 of 2011 and Cross Objection No.54 of 2014.

2. The Petitioner in cross objection is the Review Petitioner herein. The Respondents in the cross objection are his sisters. They had filed SA.No.315 of 2011.

3. The 1st Appellant in SA.No.315 of 2011, Jayalakshmi @ Chinnammal, was the Plaintiff in OS.No.90 of 2002, on the file of the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Vanoor. She had filed the suit seeking preliminary decree for partition of the suit properties into four equal shares and for allotment of one such share to her. In the Schedule of the properties, there were seven items of properties. By judgment and decree dated 26.8.2009, the District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Vanoor, had partly decreed the suit and had held that the Plaintiff was entitled to an undivided 1/8th share in items (1) and (7) and further granted an undivided 1/4th share in item (4) of the suit properties and dismissed the suit as against items (2), (3), (5) and (6) of the suit properties. As against the said judgment and decree, the 3rd Defendant Mayilasalam had filed


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top