M.V.MURALIDARAN
LAKSHMI – Appellant
Versus
P. MANICKAM – Respondent
M.V. Muralidaran, J.
C.R.P. (PD) Nos. 2809 of 2010 is preferred challenging the order dated 27.03.2010 made in I.A.No.181 of 2008 in O.S.No.534/2005 on the file of the 2nd Additional District Munsif, Erode, transposing the 1st respondent herein (R. Manickam) as 2nd plaintiff in the suit upon the death of the original plaintiff.
2. C.R.P. (PD) No.2812 of 2011 is preferred challenging the order dated 23.03.2011 in I.A.No.125 of 2011 in O.S.No.760 of 2007 on the file of the 1st Additional District Munsif, Erode allowing the application to implead one Palaniswamy as 4th defendant in the suit.
3. C.R.P.(PD) Nos. 4225 to 4227 of 2013 are preferred under Article 227 of the Constitution of India praying to strike off the respective plaints in O.S.No.534 of 2005 on the file of the 2nd Additional District Munsif, Erode), O.S.No.760 of 2007 on the file of the 1st Additional District Munsif, Erode) and O.S.No.28 of 2013 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Erode).
4. The following are the brief facts germane for the disposal of all the Civil Revision Petitions:
O.S.No.534 of 2005 was preferred by one Sadayammal seeking a decree for partition of the suit properties in to two and to al
State of Uttar Pradesh v. District Judge, Unno and Ors.
Ranipet Municipality Rep. By Its Comer. and Special Officer, Ranipet v. M. Shamsheerkhan
Des Raj v. Bhagat Ram (Dead) by LRs.
Mayar (H.K.) Ltd. v. Owners & Partners, Vessel M.V. Fortune Express and others
Liverpool & London S.P. & I Association Ltd. v. M.V. Sea Success I
P.V. Guru Raj Reddy Represented by GPA Laxmi Narayan Reddy v. P. Neeradha Reddy
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.