M.V. Muralidaran, J.

1. The case of the revision petitioners is that they have purchased some stretch of properties viz the properties mentioned as item Nos.5 and 6 in Schedule of properties in suit in O.S. No. 170 of 2006. The said properties were purchased from their vendors for a valid sale consideration and registered the sale deed dated 11.12.1991 and 14.03.2007. Thereafter the purchase of the aforementioned properties, the revision petitioners carried out several developments over the said properties viz

1. Fencing expenses of entire item 5 and 6 incurred by the Revision Petitioners

2. Two wells were depended by digging 40 feet further.

3. Erected 10 bore wells.

4. Constructed cattle shed measuring 1,200 sq.ft.

5. A new tiled house about 1.200 sq.ft.

6. Planted 350 coconut saplings

7. Expenses incurred for levelling the land fit for cultivation.

2. Being so, an Advocate Commissioner claimed to be appointed in the above said O.S. No. 170 of 2006 visited the suit property. Thereupon the revision petitioners got knowledge of a suit for partition in O.S. No. 170 of 2006, that was pending between the revision petitioners' vendor and his family members. Furthermore the revision petit