SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Mad) 3975

D.KRISHNAKUMAR
Kannayiram – Appellant
Versus
Thalaivar, Thoppampatti Ooratchi Mandram – Respondent


ORDER :

D. Krishnakumar, J.

The Civil Revision Petition has been filed against the fair and decretal order dated 21.04.2010 passed in I.A. No.320 of 2010 in O.S. No.47 of 2005 on the file of the District Munsif, Harur.

2. The learned counsel for the revision petitioner submitted that the revision petitioner filed the suit in O.S. No. 47 of 2015 on the file of the District Munsif, Harur seeking for relief of declaration, permanent injunction and mandatory injunction on the basis of the sale deed dated 11.07.1992. At the time of filing of the suit, the date of the sale deed was wrongly mentioned as 11.07.1992 instead of 11.07.1997 in the plaint. Since, there is a typographical error in the plaint, the revision petitioner filed I.A. No.320 of 2010 seeking for amendment in the plaint. The learned District Munsif, without considering the sale deed dated 11.07.1997, which was produced by the petitioner/plaintiff, has erroneously dismissed the application holding that the amendment sought for by the plaintiff cannot be accepted as it would affect the nature of the suit. Aggrieved by the said order, the present civil revision petition has been filed.

3. The learned counsel, in support of his s
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top