2018 Supreme(Mad) 359
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
K.K. SASIDHARAN, N. SATHISH KUMAR, JJ.
B. Stalin – Petitioner
Versus
The Chief Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu and Others – Respondents
W.P. (MD) No. 15658 of 2015 & M.P. (MD) No. 1 of 2015
Decided On : 20-02-2018
For the Petitioner: A. Kannan.
For the Respondents: M. Govindan, T.S. Md. Mohideen, M. Lingadurai.
Adherence to building regulations and safety protocols, proper inspection and safety audits before granting liquor licenses
Headnote:
Building Regulations - Fire Safety - Tamil Nadu Liquor (License and Permit) Rules 1981 - [VIOLATION OF BUILDING REGULATIONS, ILLEGAL LIQUOR LICENCE] - [Development Control Regulations: 5(2) A, 5(2) B, 5(2) C, 5(2) D, 5(2) E, 5(2) F, 5(2) G, Rule 3(3) 11, Tamil Nadu Liquor (License and Permit) Rules 1981: Section 2(xvi)] - The court discussed the violations of building regulations, including excess FSI, plot coverage, and inadequate parking space, and the illegal issuance of a liquor license to a mall that did not meet the criteria for a star hotel as per the Tamil Nadu Liquor (License and Permit) Rules 1981. The judgment highlighted the importance of adhering to building regulations and safety protocols and emphasized the need for proper inspection and safety audits before granting liquor licenses.
Fact of the Case:
The court addressed the violations committed by a shopping mall in Madurai, including non-adherence to building regulations and the illegal issuance of a liquor license.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the mall had violated building regulations and did not meet the criteria for a star hotel as per the Tamil Nadu Liquor (License and Permit) Rules 1981. The court quashed the liquor license and emphasized the need for proper inspection and safety audits before granting such licenses.
Issues: Violation of building regulations, illegal issuance of liquor license
Ratio Decidendi: Adherence to building regulations, proper inspection and safety audits before granting liquor licenses
Final Decision: The court quashed the liquor license and directed authorities to conduct a safety audit and ensure compliance with building regulations before considering a fresh application for a liquor license.
K.K. SASIDHARAN, J.
Introductory
1. It is said that the fire in Sri Meenakshi Temple on Friday, the 2 February 2018 was a disaster waiting to happen for a long time. The unfortunate incident at the heritage building should be taken as a wake up call for undertaking a mass drive against illegal buildings, especially the multi-storeyed buildings constructed in violation of the Building Regulations as it is a constant threat to the safety and security of the people of Madurai. In case, the Fire Officers, Local Planning Authority, District Administration, Municipal Corporation and Police are insensitive to the issue regarding mushroom growth of illegal buildings and the safety aspects and inspite of a slew of fire accidents, safety audits are not conducted regularly, there is every possibility of another Uphaar Tragedy at the Temple City of Madurai.
2. The magnitude of the violation of building regulations and non adherence to the safety protocol at Vishaal De Mal, Madurai is evident from the following inspection report submitted by the District Collector and the Local Planning Authority, Madurai on 7 August 2017, pursuant to the direction given by this Court in this writ petition challenging the liquor licence issued to the multi storeyed shopping mall, situated adjacent to a petrol outlet at Gokhale Road, which is the nerve centre of Madurai.
“As per DCR (Development Control Regulations):
The building comes under the Multi-Storied Building (MSB) - Category III.
Rule No.
Description
Required
Available
Excess/Less
Remarks
5(2) A
Minimum Plot extent
2500 Sq. M.
3608.36 Sq. M.
Excess 1108.36 Sq. M.
Satisfied
5(2) B
Minimum Plot Width/frontage
40 Meter
42.06 Meter
Excess 2.06 Meter
Satisfied
5(2) C
Minimum Road Width
18 Meter
18 Meter
Satisfied
5(2) D
Maximum FSI
2.25
4.28
Excess 2.03
90.22% Deviation
5(2) E
Maximum Plot coverage
Above 30%
upto 40%
76.91%
Excess 36.91%
92.28% Deviation
5(2) F
Maximum height above ground level
60 Meter
27.6 Meter
--
Satisfied
5(2) G
Minimum setback all around
North
7 Meter
1.5 Meter (excluding projection)
5.5 Meter
(-) Less
78.57% Deviation
South
7 Meter
2.2 Meter (excluding projection)
4.8 Meter
(-) Less
68.57% Deviation
East (front open)
7 Meter
5.7 Meter (excluding projection)
1.3 Meter
(-) Less
18.57% Deviation (Fire escape open steel stair case provided in front of 5.7 Meter length)
West
7 Meter
Nil
7 Meter (-)
Less
100 % Deviation
Required Parking Details:
Shopping Centre
200 Nos.
Restaurant
31 Nos.
Theatre
67 Nos.
Rooms
2 Nos.
Total No. of required Car Parking
300 Nos.
Provided Car Parking:
Basement I
40 Nos.
Basement II
55 Nos.
Total No. of Car Parking (Provided)
95 Nos.
The Dimension of Parking slot shall be 5.0 metre x 2.5 metre with a minimum width of driveway of 3.5 metre for one way movement and 7.2 metre width for two way movement. In this building as per the DCR norms, 300 cars should be accommodated with driveway facilities in Basement Floor I & Basement Floor II. But, the space is not sufficient for parking and it violates the DCR Rule 3(3) 11.”
3. The District Collector, Madurai rejected the application for issuing licence for opening multiple theatres at the shopping mall. The mall got the licence to open five theatres on the top floor of the building and exhibit films pursuant to the direction given by this Court by agreeing with the submission of the builder that it was constructed in accordance with the planning permission given by the Commissioner, Madurai Corporation, notwithstanding the legal position that the Commissioner has no authority to approve the building plan for a multi-storeyed building. The builder is now banking upon the earlier orders of the High Court to prevent