SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Mad) 518

T.RAVINDRAN
Jagan – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner, Pollachi Municipality – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants :C.R. Prasannan, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

Challenge in this second appeal is made to the judgment and decree dated 30.12.02 passed in A.S.No.19/2002, on the file of the Subordinate Court, Pollachi, confirming the judgment and decree dated 14.09.2001 passed in O.S. No.124/2001, on the file of District Munsif Court, Pollachi.

2. The second appeal has been admitted and the following substantial question of law was formulated for consideration:

Whether the finding of the Courts below that the suit is not maintainable in view of the statutory remedies available against the order challenged in the suit under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu District Municipalities Act is illegal, since the ground put forward is that the procedure established by law has not been followed?

3. Inasmuch as the only point that is involved in this second appeal is as to whether the civil suit is maintainable as regards the challenge made to the revision of the tax made by the authorities concerned under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu District Municipalities Act 1920, without following the statutory remedies available under the above said Act.

4. Shorn of unnecessary details, it is found that three special notices had been issued by the defenda

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top