The respondents in the civil revision petition have filed this review application seeking to review the order dated 27.03.2017 passed in C.R.P. (NPD) No.465 of 2006.

2. The review petitioners are the tenants and the respondents are the landlords. In the civil revision petition, it was alleged by the landlords that the first review petitioner herein is a chronic defaulter and that the first review petitioner has sublet the property to the second review petitioner, without obtaining written consent from the respondents herein, and despite several reminders, rent and arrears were not paid. The landlords also pleaded that the petition premises is required for own use and occupation.

3. This Court, by order dated 27.3.2017, allowed the civil revision petition holding that the landlords are entitled to eviction on the ground of own use and occupation. The tenants were granted three months time to vacate the petition premises.

4. The learned counsel for the tenants submits that the even though the Appellate Authority held that there is no proof as to carrying on of business of the landlords, the High Court erroneously concluded that the landlords are carrying on business in the petiti