M.DHANDAPANI
Dhanabal Ebenesar – Appellant
Versus
State Rep. by Sub-Inspector of Police, Tenkasi Police Station – Respondent
1. This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash C.C. No. 453 of 2010 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court, Tenkasi, Tirunelveli District.
2. The case of the petitioner/A5 is that he is running a Printing Press and printed Pamphlets given by A1 to A4, who were not arrayed as parties before this Court. On 14.08.2007, a murder was occurred in Tenkasi Town and expressing their solidarity, A1 to A4 printed the Pamphlets in the petitioner's Printing Press. Aggrieved by the Pamphlets, the respondent police registered a case against the petitioner as well as other accused persons under Section 153(A) I.P.C. and Section 7(1)(a) of the Criminal Law Amendment Act read with Section 109 I.P.C.
3. It is useful to extract below the details mentioned in the Pamphlet.
4. It is also relevant to extract below the charge-sheet filed before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Tenkasi, Tirunelveli District.
5. On perusal of the pamphlet as well as the charge-sheet, there is no commission of offence against the national security or against the tranquillity to the law and order. However, if at all there is any allegation, the Law Enforcing Agency has made allegations only against A1 to A4
Central Bureau of Investigation vs. Duncans Agro Industries Ltd. 1996 (5) SCC 591
Hridaya Ranjan Prasad Verma vs. State of Bihar
Indian Oil Corporation vs. NEPC India Ltd. and Others
Medical Chemicals & Pharma (P) Ltd. vs. Biological E. Ltd. 2000 (3) SCC 269
Madhavrao Jiwajirao Scindia vs. Sambhajirao Chandrojirao Angre
Rupan Deol Bajaj vs. Kanwar Pal Singh Gill
Rajesh Bajaj vs. State NCT of Delhi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.