SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Mad) 1682

P.RAJAMANICKAM
Manonmani – Appellant
Versus
D. Selvaraj – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : M/s.A.S.Vijayaraghavan & Mr.D.Shivakumaran.

JUDGMENT :

1. This second appeal has been filed by the defendants against the Judgment and Decree passed by the 1st Additional District Judge cum Chief Judicial Magistrate, Coimbatore in A.S.No.41 of 1999 dated 06.08.1999 reversing the Judgment and Decree passed by the III Additional District Munsif, Coimbatore in O.S.No.2186 of 1994 dated 10.12.1998.

2. The respondent herein has filed a suit in O.S.No.2186 of 1994 on the file of the III Additional District Munsif, Coimbatore, for permanent injunction to restrain the defendants, their men, agents, etc., from interfering with his peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit property. The learned District Munsif has dismissed the said suit with cost by the Judgment dated 10.12.1998. Aggrieved by the same, the plaintiff has filed an appeal in A.S.No.41 of 1999 on the file of the 1st Additional District Judge -cum- Chief Judicial Magistrate, Coimbatore. The learned 1st Additional District Judge-cum-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Coimbatore, by his Judgment dated 06.08.1999, has allowed the said appeal with cost and set aside the Judgment and Decree passed by the Trial Court and decreed the suit as prayed for with cost. As against the same,


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top